Earl it is NOT a SB choice it's an ATMEL choice it came with the chipset I believe it's like the intel chipsets the vendor can't be picky how the chipset is designed.

 


From: Earl Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

That doc was worth the read ! It clears up my perception of RSSI now. The only gripe I have is why SB chose a rather coarse 40 step range instead of a 100 step range like cisco ? This is not a flame at SB just a question. I'm sure there is an answer. (Financial problely)

Earl - UpHi.net

BTW my rssi plots using MRTG seem reasonable in percentage.

 

-------Original Message-------

 

 

Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 04:31:49 PM

Subject: RE: [smartBridges] AirBridge dBm RSSI Readings

 

We do not have the accurate value. But you can refer to this doc http://www.wildpackets.com/elements/whitepapers/Converting_Signal_Strength.pdf for reference and understanding. Anyone has better source?

 

Alex

sB Tech Support

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ole Bj�rklund
Sent:
Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:40 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] AirBridge dBm RSSI Readings

 

 

Does you have an accurate value of what the dBm should be when

getting 40 from the unit??  (like 20 30 40 whatever dbm?)

 

Regards

Oleb

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: sB Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: 13. august 2003 22:42

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: RE: [smartBridges] AirBridge dBm RSSI Readings

 

 

 

The RSSI display in percent will be more accurate to indicate how strong

the signal is. The internal formula to dbm conversion is not accurate

(eg.100% is -10dbm) and that is the reason we came out the option to

allow user to define their own conversion table. SO you can set like

100% equal to -45dbm, etc.. which is similar to other vendor dbm

reading.

 

Alex

sB Tech Support

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:34 AM

To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

Subject: Re: [smartBridges] AirBridge dBm RSSI Readings

 

Has there been a resolution to this yet? I just did an install that is

reporting a signal level of -10dbm.

 

The latest firmware allows you to punch in your own values for dbm

levels, but this hardly helps to provide an accurate measurement of

signal level.

 

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 

> This may have been discussed before, but I missed it. Where the hell

do

> the dBm numbers come from that are reported by the SmartBridges gear.

> There is NO WAY some of my links are operating at -17dBm. Anyone from

SB

> care to chime in here?

 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe

smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in

the body type unsubscribe

smartBridges)

Archives: http://archives.part-15.org 

 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe

smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in

the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)

Archives: http://archives.part-15.org 

 

** This message does not contain any viruses - scanned by Elektron and

Webconnect virusscanner  **

 

** This message does not contain any viruses - scanned by Elektron and Webconnect virusscanner  **

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>

To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)

Archives: http://archives.part-15.org 

 

 

 

 

____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

<<attachment: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to