Geeze, read the second paragraph

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shawn Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 04:30 PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB


> So your saying it's normal for the radio's to lock up and everything
else...
> The ones that don't and work as advertised are just exceptional ones?
>
> Didn't realize it was normal for these to not work... :-\
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Banes
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 18:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
>
>
> All components have a nominal value and then a +/- tolerance. When the
radio
> is designed it is designed to work under a range of conditions using
> components within the tolerance range. In actual practice, most radios
work
> within the "normal" range, a few radios manage to get the "perfect"
> components and they work well beyond the design range. If the luck of the
> draw gives you a "perfect" unit it doesn't mean the others are defective,
> only that they are normal.
>
> Please keep in mind that I am not saying the problem is yours. I am saying
> that if SB made a error in the original design specifications then it
would
> be quite possible that most radios would have sporadic problems, but the
> "perfect" unit might work fine.
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gloria Vester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 02:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
>
>
> > OK, I will buy that.  So the smartBridges are cheaper and more sensitive
> to
> > environmental issues.  Why then do I have one APPO that hasn't had a
> problem
> > yet?
> >
> > <bouncing the ball back to you>
> >
> > Gloria
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 2:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
> >
> >
> > > Different radios.  Different frequency.  Different antennas.
> > >
> > > More money ;-).
> > >
> > > The list goes on and on.
> > >
> > > Some things we never do figure out.
> > >
> > > marlon
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Gloria Vester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:01 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can you tell me where to find the list of MAC addresses that are
being
> > > > recalled?  I am working on my RMAs now and I have a feeling that all
> > five
> > > of
> > > > the units I have are from the same batch.  When I asked them how
many
> of
> > > my
> > > > units to RMA, they said it was up to me and my "comfort level".  I
> don't
> > > > want to bash SB either - it is counter productive, and they are
being
> > very
> > > > supportive in trying to help.  But at the same time, I agree with
you
> > that
> > > > it would have been more cost effective to have just recalled and
> > replaced
> > > > all the units that were suspect and saved themselves a lot of bad
> > > publicity
> > > > and us a lot of lost revenue.
> > > >
> > > > I have had it pointed out to me from several different sources on
this
> > > list
> > > > that the problem is more than likely not with the airPoints, that is
> > > > probably a power issue or an environmental issue.  I am not ruling
> that
> > > out
> > > > completely, and am continuing to investigate all possibilities.  But
> if
> > it
> > > > were something that we did wrong in our design and installation, why
> is
> > my
> > > > Trango backhaul working perfectly using the same power source, the
> same
> > > > cabling, the same switch, in the same temperature environment?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gloria
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:47 PM
> > > > Subject: [smartBridges] Sticking up for sB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I am feeling a bit guilty for hammering sB so badly...but it is
> there
> > > > > fault after all.  They could have resolved this a long time ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the explanation as given to me from them (simplified
> version):
> > > > > In June there were 2 production lines putting together sB
equipment.
> > > > > One with bad chips, one with good chips.  My use of "bad chips" is
> my
> > > > > own.  They call it "timing issue" chips.
> > > > >
> > > > > Prior to getting stamped with MAC addresses, the units are brought
> > back
> > > > > together on one line and stamped.  Therefore, there is NO way to
say
> > > > > exactly which units have the "bad chips".
> > > > >
> > > > > This is why sB is not recalling the entire series of MAC
> > > > > addresses...there are a bunch of good ones mixed in there as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > You may be thinking the same thing I am right now....hmmmm....why
> > > > > wouldn't they just go ahead and recall the whole batch??
Hindsight,
> > > > > they would probably have saved a lot of money in lost revenue from
> the
> > > > > bad publicity.  And it would have MOST definitely saved us a TON
of
> > > > > money, and therefore retained their good reputation from us.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bottomline:  They are doing direct RMA's for all the bad June/July
> > > > > units.  Just talk to them.  We are all bitching for good
> reason...but
> > > > > just do the RMA.  It is all we can do.  Then hope they are really
> > > > > sending us good stuff this time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sully
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to