Its actually an overhead calculation, but roughly, what ever the 
negotiation level is at, you get about 60% usable...  roughly.. is what 
we have found.



-----Original Message-----
From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:57:10 -0800
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Forcing the AP to 2 MB

> Thats my problem I have users at full pop 1.5 meg and some as low as
> 386 I
> just got my new bonded t-1s here at the noc and am pulling 2.7 megs up
> and
> down now that I have the radios set to 2 megs no one is seeing really
> anything more then 1 meg. Remember when setting to 2 meg you are
> actually
> getting maybe 1 meg 11 meg you get 5.5 meg from my understanding..
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Scott Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:47 AM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Forcing the AP to 2 MB
> 
> 
> I really just depends on the bandwidth you are selling.  I have 128K up
> to 1MB so I have set all of my clients to 11MB with autofallback to 5MB
> in case of interference.  I have B/W allocated with a Mikrotik box.
> 
> -Scott Wells
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [smartBridges] Forcing the AP to 2 MB
> 
> 
> I have a question...after reading a few posts on here, I'm wondering
> the
> 
> implications of setting my APs to 2 MB, no auto-fallback (or even 1 MB,
> no
> auto-fallback.) Would this be a good idea?
> 
> By design, none of my customers get more than 384k down, 256k up. And
> those are business customers that are mainly all on only during the
> daytime.
> 
> Would this be a good idea? Also, I'm assuming that setting the AP to
> say,
> 1 MB only, that this setting will override the CPE settings because the
> AP
> will only talk at this speed and no faster?
> 
> I'd appreciate any thoughts on this.
> 
> Thanks!
> Sam
> 
> 
> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> 
> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> 
> 
> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to