On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:10:17 -0500
"Tom Haynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the only comptibility issue with SB and Cisco is that Cisco uses
> short preamble by default and SB (as well as most other vendors) use
> long. The only other common issue that I can think of is that SB uses
> adress 4 field for complete transparent bridging between Aps and few
> other vendors support this. So, if you use an APPo in Client Beidge mode
> it needs to talk to another APPo or other AP supporting adress 4 field
> use.
Is there an advantage/disadvantage one way or the other with short vs
long preamble?
---
Homer Parker
LAN/WAN, Wireless Networking, PC Sales/Service
Linux, OS/2 and Windows Support
PC Services 785.483.7602
129 W 8th #101 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell, KS 67665 http://www.pcsrvc.com
"So for the IT Manager Role, you want someone who's absolute crap, looks
reasonable on paper, and won't cause too much trouble. ... Well I don't
have any MCSEs on my books at the moment, but I could call around."
-- Simon Travaglia
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
