Hmm..Scott have you tried this already with that effect?


On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:33, shoffman wrote:
Ok, here is an interesting scenario...

Multiple AP's connected on a switched network.  Now, you have disable 
inter-client communications.  But all this does is stop people on the 
same AP from talking to other computers on that same AP.  Well, how about 
computers on the other AP.  They are not blocked by disabling interclient 
communications, so the scenarios y'all listed are possible even still.  
Guess someone better set-up some protocol blocking (or port blocking, or 
use VLAN/Trunking) blocking on the network, huh?

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: Sevak Avakians <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 04 Nov 2003 08:28:35 -0500
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?

> LOL!
> 
> Yeah, I'd click too!
> ;-)
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 18:56, The Wirefree Network wrote:
> 
> > With Windows being what it is.your machine is constantly looking for
> > shared drives/devices.  If it finds one, it maps it.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Somy clients were going into their NETWORK NEIGHBORHOOD (icon) and
> > seeing all kinds of weird stuff (ie. Quicken Backup Files, Pictures
> of
> > Wife, etc).  When you see a folder titled as these were, and you know
> > they are not yours, then you will click on them.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > And they ALL clicked away.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > If the client does not have a firewall on that PC, then it is wide
> > open.  No different than a LAN at work or school.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Sully
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sevak Avakians
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:49 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Hi Sully,
> > In order for customers to map and actually use other people's drives
> > and printers, they need to have the other computers to allow it. 
> Were
> > your customers allowing this or were they hacked into?
> > 
> > I don't get why someone would want to print to someone else's
> > printer...although I can think of MANY funny pranks!
> > :-D
> > 
> > Sevak
> > 
> > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 18:41, The Wirefree Network wrote: 
> > 
> > I personally think it is VERY bad.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > When I first opened up the network, I had interclient comm enabled
> > (allowed).   Next thing I know.I am getting complaints ALL over the
> > place about other network users downloading files off of their hard
> > drives.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > When you allow the interclient comm., then NETBIOS traffic is seen by
> > all.  They can then map each others printers, shared folders, etc.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > VERY BAD if you are running a business.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > VERY GOOD if you are running a for fun personal network.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Sully
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sevak Avakians
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:21 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I let them do it.  It hasn't had any adverse affects yet, but most of
> > my customers don't know they can use it.  Some of those who are savvy
> > enough use it for games.
> > 
> > Just let them do it.  If they go through the Internet and back to do
> > the same thing, you'll still slow down the network, right?  So you
> may
> > as well let them do it from within so that at least it will pass by
> > faster.  If they're swapping files, less time will be spent getting
> > the file from computer A to computer B if it's on your network.  If
> it
> > goes throught the Internet, it still has to go from A to B, but a
> > longer route which will add more time to the transfer.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 08:45, Colin Watson wrote: 
> > 
> > I was wondering, how many of you enable inter-client access blocking
> > on the access points? I've got some customers on the same AP who want
> > to talk to each other, but the client blocking is disabled, so they
> > can't. They are moaning over this as you'd expect, but I'm not sure
> if
> > I should disable it?. Just wondering how many others enabled/disabled
> > this feature and what effect it's had?
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > Colin.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to