Dennis,

The remote admin system in XP (and 2000) are unicast systems.  You can do 
it without interclient communication being enabled.  It will just route 
out then back in..

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: "Dennis Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:27:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?

> The question I have, is how do I allow two PPPoE Connected clients to
> connect to each other.  
> 
> I would love to have the advantage of allowing people to send me
> support requests and me take over the xp desktop!
> 
> Dennis
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Mike Davis 
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:07 PM
>   Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?
> 
> 
>   I had it on for awhile with mikrotik AP.  I turned it off and the
> traffic level decreased 10 fold.  It has a real impact on ap load.
> 
>    
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Wirefree
> Network
>   Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:42 PM
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?
> 
>    
> 
>   I personally think it is VERY bad.
> 
>    
> 
>   When I first opened up the network, I had interclient comm enabled
> (allowed).   Next thing I know�.I am getting complaints ALL over the
> place about other network users downloading files off of their hard
> drives.
> 
>    
> 
>   When you allow the interclient comm., then NETBIOS traffic is seen by
> all.  They can then map each other�s printers, shared folders, etc.
> 
>    
> 
>   VERY BAD if you are running a business.
> 
>    
> 
>   VERY GOOD if you are running a for fun personal network.
> 
>    
> 
>   Sully
> 
>    
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sevak Avakians
>   Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:21 PM
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking?
> 
>    
> 
>   I let them do it.  It hasn't had any adverse affects yet, but most of
> my customers don't know they can use it.  Some of those who are savvy
> enough use it for games.
> 
>   Just let them do it.  If they go through the Internet and back to do
> the same thing, you'll still slow down the network, right?  So you may
> as well let them do it from within so that at least it will pass by
> faster.  If they're swapping files, less time will be spent getting the
> file from computer A to computer B if it's on your network.  If it goes
> throught the Internet, it still has to go from A to B, but a longer
> route which will add more time to the transfer.
> 
> 
>   On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 08:45, Colin Watson wrote: 
> 
>   I was wondering, how many of you enable inter-client access blocking
> on the access points? I've got some customers on the same AP who want
> to talk to each other, but the client blocking is disabled, so they
> can't. They are moaning over this as you'd expect, but I'm not sure if
> I should disable it?. Just wondering how many others enabled/disabled
> this feature and what effect it's had?
>    
>   Thanks
>    
>   Colin. 
> 
> 
> 
>   ---
>   Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>   Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ---
>   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>   Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
> 
> 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to