Sure will be able to. Usually I setup a pppoe server on a interface and on the same interface I setup the hotspot server that way if someone don't run pppoe they can still be able to get on and I will be able to control my users in a secure way (or you will be able to).
Keep in mind not everything available in MikroTik is GPLed software that you can download and install they have written any things completely from scratch because the other open source things out there have poor functionality at best. Best regards, Eje "Aya" Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 240-376-7272 - Your Full Time Professionals - Online Store http://www.wisp-router.com/ MikroTik, Star-OS, PACWireless, EnGenius, RF Industries -- IE> Will Mikrotik allow me to have one interface for answering PPPoE IE> requests, while at the same time having another interface for routing IE> dedicated IP's (non-pppoe, straight IP) to my corporate clients? I need IE> to be able to shape traffic in both instances. IE> Andrew Watkins wrote: >>Try the MikroTik RouterOS for free by downloading a fully functional trial >>version from http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html. Also make sure you >>download the manual. >> >>IMHO I think at $45 RouterOS is worth every penny - or cent for you guys >>across the pond ;-). Within an hour it's paid for itself. >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>On Behalf Of Ian Ellison >>Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:52 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [smartBridges] NetBSD Traffic Shaping / PPPoE >> >>Anyone out there running this setup? If so, could you point me to some >>documentation or give me an idea of what i need to use to do traffic shaping >>and setup PPPoE server with NetBSD 1.6? I'm 100% comfortable in Linux using >>iptables, and had been using HTB for my traffic shaping. >>However, it seems that there is no good FREE PPPoE server for Linux, and >>I've heard good things about the NetBSD implementation, so I'm considering >>going that route. I thought about using Mikrotik, but I'm familiar enough >>with what it is doing on the kernel level to setup the same type of system >>myself without paying for the RouterOS, although I would be interested to >>know what PPPoE server they run on Mikrotik. >>Thanks for any suggestions. >> >>Ian >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges >><yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >>unsubscribe smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges >><yournickname> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> >> IE> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List IE> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type IE> subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> IE> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) IE> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
