Re: [Sndbox] Shall or should not

[Greg Hopper]

Interesting, very... ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List' Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:09 PM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Shall or should not King James Version from the E-Sword electronic bible. Joh 3:16 For1063 God2316 so3779 loved25 the3588 world,2889 that5620 he gave1325 his848 only begotten3439 Son,5207 that2443 whosoever3956 believeth4100 in1519 him846 should not3361 perish,622 but235 have2192 everlasting166 life.2222 American Standard Version from the same. Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have eternal life. Some BBE version Joh 3:16 For God had such love for the world that he gave his only Son, so that whoever has faith in him may not come to destruction but have eternal life. International Standard Version... Joh 3:16 "For this is how God loved the world: He gave his unique Son so that everyone who believes in him might not perish but have eternal life. Spanish version... :) Joh 3:16 Porque de tal manera amó Dios al mundo, que dio a su Hijo unigénito, para que todo aquel que cree en El, no se pierda, mas tenga vida eterna. LIT version Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that everyone believing into Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Modern King James Version... Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. :Youngs Literal Translation Joh 3:16 for God did so love the world, that His Son--the only begotten--He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during.   David L. Ben Franklin:  "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt, they have more need of masters." -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Greg Hopper Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:51 AM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Shall or should not Weird....that yours reads different  I mean..... ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List' Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 7:04 PM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Shall or should not Says in the flyleaf "Authorized King James Version"  The NASB also uses shall and it uses a literal word for word translation method where the KJV used a phrase for phrase translation method.   Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Hopper Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 6:34 PM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Shall or should not   Are "sure" you were looking at a KJV? I just looked at "5" different copies we have...all KJV...without exception they all say should not ...so was just curious. lol  ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List' Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:45 AM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Shall or should not   Actually my copy of the KJV says shall, so I suppose there are differences in printing runs.   Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Hopper Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 5:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Sndbox] Shall or should not   Interesting, take your word for it because I wouldn't know for sure without looking it up. lol   I know what David was getting at though, because there certainly are numerous scriptures that would seem to bear out the difference of the shall or should not there...even if that one doesn't have the word difference in the origional it seemed to there in the KJV I suppose? Still wouldn't present a conflict to me.....        Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:27:59 -0400 From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Thesis Question #2 To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Indeed it could, but the greek word used is a definitive.  It is shall in the original manuscripts.       Greg Hopper ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net

________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net