I am
now bowing out of this particular argument before I say something I later
regret. It's on my tongue to say it now, but I am refraining from doing anything
that might would come out as a flame. I've made my point and made it quite clear
and if no one agrees with it, then I'm sorry. But nothing is going to change my
mind on this.
-----Original Message-----In a message dated 9/27/2003 8:12:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)
You highlighted my words, ( They are weak from the circumstances of their marriage so if someone shows them a little attention they are weak and will give in. (and alot of times feel like crap about it later)) and then said that I said thought men were weak. Not all men are weak. Every marriage is different and all the circumstances are different. I said though, those men due to the circumstances of their marriage can be weak and give in when shown the affection and attention they want and crave. I am far from a man hater and I dont think anywhere in any of my posts have I shown anything that would make others think I am a man hater
yep makes almost as much sense as being called a manhater when you are saying they should be strong enough to make their own choices huh charles? :)))))))
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
