Sorry
this one struck me as funny, not b/c of what was said but b/c according to this
I said that....not Charles, hehe
-----Original Message-----In a message dated 10/6/2003 1:08:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing
Ok, am I the only one outraged? Here is this man, in tax payer supported housing...basically he has someone else paying for his rent, yet he can keep exotic animals? Don't these animals cost a lot of money to feed? I would think a tiger did. If he can feed a tiger, he can bloody well pay for his rent and not live in public housing.
the difference here is that he was keeping the tiger and alligator illegally from what i understand
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
