Bet your money he wouldn't have..... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:03 AM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking...
> But why? Why would it be disallowed. The forensic evidence showed that > none of the fluids in her panties belonged to Kobe. It shows that it does > belong to an unnamed person. Isn't that relevant? Seriously, how can it > not be allowed unless they are trying to railroad him? > > I mean it is the prosecutor's witness making these claims. He's under oath > and is having to admit that the case is weak. If Bryant were not famous > would the prosecutor even bring a weak case like this to trial? > > > Charles Mims > http://www.the-sandbox.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Tim Harder > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:58 AM > To: The Sandbox Discussion List > Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking... > > > Just playing Devils advocate here.... > > A lawyer on FOX last night had the opinion that all this stuff in pre-trial > that the defense is purporting (even if it *is* rebutle Charles) is designed > to taint the rep of the accusor and much of it will not be allowed at the > real trial. (just another spin) ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
