It's not unheard of.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:23 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Providing clarification
Holy smokes!.... did you guys just reach some common ground? <G>
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 11:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/16/2003 12:49:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been thinking about that evidence. If the judge is supposed to be deciding whether this trial goes to court based on the evidence, then the thing for him to do since the evidence presented is obviously against the prosecution, is to demand they show what they have before he makes his decision. He can't rule on what they "might" have. He can only rule on what is presented in the prelim. You think he will do that in order to be fair? I'm betting he won't.
yeah i think you have a good point there he should ask to see if they have more evidence or else with the lack of whats been presented dismiss it. but your right he wont because he dont want to be the one who let kobe go________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
