I agree... That is hardly a novel idea, however....
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Bethany wrote:
<basically her main criticism was<image.tiff>
that we need more UN involvement. >
another reason I can't stand her. The UN is useless and should be treated as such.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Harder
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
OK... I read a few more reports... basically her main criticism was
that we need more UN involvement. She thinks that Bush is
somehow holding it back or messing that up, which is stupid if
you ask me... Koffe Anan won't even attend the meetings. I bet
he would if Hillary was the president.
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, at 06:32 AM, Charles wrote:
> What she said *publicly* was that the attacks against US interests were
> successful at demoralizing the troops and if Bush didn't change they
> would
> only get more successful. That sounds like she is saying they were
> doing a
> good job to me.
>
>
> Charles Mims
> http://www.the-sandbox.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tim Harder
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: The Sandbox Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
>
>
>
> She told the terrorists that they were doing a good job?
>
> <crap, I thought I read that thing>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 09:54 PM, Charles wrote:
>
>> Here is the problem, or part of it...
>>
>> The definition of treason involves aid and comfort to the enemy.
>> Isn't it
>> well within the realm of plausibility that a Senator (one of the
>> highest offices in our system) who publicly tells the enemy that they
>> are doing a good job is crossing that line?
>>
>>
>> Charles Mims
>> http://www.the-sandbox.org
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Tim Harder
>> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:42 PM
>> To: The Sandbox Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
>>
>>
>> OK... good angle...
>>
>> How 'bout this.... she was a senator ... on a fact finding mission...
>> she has
>> an opinion... reporters are sticking microphones in her face asking
>> her opinion...
>>
>> I thought that she sounded much like any other politician that might
>> have been in the same situation...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 09:17 PM, Lowell R. Matthews wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Harder wrote:
>>>
>>>> How.... is she worse?
>>>
>>> She's an elected official of the U.S. government. Hanoi Jane was an
>>> actress.
>>>
>>> ---Lowell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sndbox mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sndbox mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sndbox mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sndbox mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sndbox mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
