|
Tim, there are "hypotheticals" and then
there are "no way in hells."
Clinton could/would have never handled Iraq
or 9/11 the way Bush 43 has.
It just isn't even
hypothetical.
;)
~*~*Bethany*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:02
AM
Subject: [Sndbox] Weapons of mass
(Hypothetical)
I really don't see Clinton's quotes as haunting
*him*... they haunt the Democratic Party.
What if this was the end of
*Clinton's* first term and he had handled all of the events
after 9/11
exactly as Bush has. Yes exactly... What would the Republican candidates
be
saying in there election speeches about Clinton's foreign
policies?
So who actually was convinced that Saddam has/had weapons of
mass destruction? Direct quotes can certainly come back to haunt you. Read
on.....
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the
capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to
deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb.
4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our
purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by
Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
- President Clinton,
Feb. 17, 1998
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing
list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
