If I may add some of my ignorance here.
It appears to me running is a perceived advantage and not necessary
additive to the extend next to 1:1. As I cannot see how the system
speed at the end of a run up can be maintained while posting for the
final acceleration phase. What I mean is that we can either run
properly, post properly, or missing those together properly.
About the methodology, I might have missed one significant point some
where in the posted analysis Cris made, probably embedded in his
Mathlab scrips. That deceleration will take place during the pull up
phase where centrifugal force (16Gs?) adds to wing loading will come
out as added induced drag and therefore deceleration, is it explicitly
stated in the report?
If we conceive that over shoulder acceleration is the only style,
consider the disc style.
YK Chan
Seattle
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
