Tom
Yes there is one very good reason Dollars. They just make one Tx and
several modules and they can sell to the world. Also here in the UK we
have different frequency ranges for Aircraft and surface models so one
Tx two modules I can do both,
Another question to your question. If it wasn't common practice why go
to the expense of crystal sockets and access just solder the thing
straight in the PCB.
Dave
In message <002b01c0810b$a8bfa850$8a3e6620@watson1>, Tom Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>If this was in fact a universally accepted practice, then why would the mfrs
>bother with the added expense and complexity of modules? Just providing
>access to the crystal would be sufficient.
>
>No, I think they do it for a reason...
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 3:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [RCSE] transmitter crystal changing
>
>
>Guys
>
>I cannot understand the problem we change crystals in both the Rx and Tx
>as a matter of course here in the UK with no problems what so ever. In
>fact it is common at comps with a fly-off you may well have to do this
>just to fly.
>
>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
