> It could still be a good event if the turnaround was moved back so that a
> typical modern composite sailplane could not launch high enough to get
more
> than about 5 minutes without finding lift.

Chuck,
By "if the turnaround was moved back" I assume that you mean shortening the
winch line. I'll support shortening the winch line if you'll support
removing those ugly skegs and sharks teeth. :)

Unfortunately, the chances of either one happening are somewhere between
little and none. Shorter launch lines means that you have to improve your
thermal-finding ability in order to score well in a contest and removing
skegs and sharks teeth means that you have to improve your landing ability
if you want to score landing points. Very few people have the desire to
actually improve their skills; most want their equipment delude them into
believing they are better flyers.

With long launch lines and vastly improved sailplanes, the only way to make
the event more challenging is to increase the flight times as has been noted
by others on this exchange. With increased task times, the number of rounds
flown must necessarily decrease and that too creates a problem in that
people who drive a great distance have the desire to fly as much as
possible, which they equate to getting in as many rounds as possible.

Again, I'll agree with you to shorten launch lines to make the flying task
more challenging if you'll agree with me to outlaw landing arresting devices
to make the landing task more challenging.

Regards,
Bob Johnson
Fond du Lac, WI


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.

Reply via email to