Re: [RCSE] Evo vs 9303

[Marta Zavala]

Not sure which is better, but the EVO is truly pretty easy, very logical to program.  I am much more comfortable with it that I ever was with any JR/Asian radio programming. Walter -----Original Message----- From: Lydon, Matthew (NBC Universal) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: soaring@airage.com <soaring@airage.com> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:55 PM Subject: [RCSE] Evo vs 9303 I'm seriously considering either  an Evo or a 9303 - opinions?   I like the idea of the variable 'digi' mixers on the evo, and also like the idea of any function to any channel. The  synth/scanner function would be awesome, as would the battery management features. On the down side, I have a feeling that the  programming it is a royal pain - pun intended. Mixers being global sounds like a bummer, too.   The 9303 seems to have terrific programming, but lacks all these other things. Given that the 9's cost about the same - which is ultimately BETTER   Matt