On 29/03/10 15:30, Ted Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:04 -0400, Rob Myers wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:29:37 +0200 (CEST), Carlo von Loesch >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Matt Lee typeth: >>> | This is also why I think something in a browser would be more >>> | understandable by a typical user. >>> >>> A user also understands a Skype client or a bittorrent plugin. >>> Maybe he even understands a Jabber client. >>> >>> The choice of tools is not limited by mental capacities yet. >>> The question is how much are you intending to through encryption, >>> thus privacy, out of the window. >> >> We're not.
By which double negative I mean that we are *not* planning to throw privacy out of the window. > Are you saying that as Rob Myers, individual, or as Rob Myers, Agent of > FooCorp? > > If the latter, what has changed between now and: > > It was my understanding since this message that GNU Social was to > demonstrate a commitment to privacy above and beyond what a facebook > clone would have. Has that changed? If so, how and why? Nothing has changed. I'm not arguing against crypto, I'm arguing in favour of coding something up. - Rob.
