On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:20 +0100, Rob Myers wrote: > On 29/03/10 15:30, Ted Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:04 -0400, Rob Myers wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:29:37 +0200 (CEST), Carlo von Loesch > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Matt Lee typeth: > >>> | This is also why I think something in a browser would be more > >>> | understandable by a typical user. > >>> > >>> A user also understands a Skype client or a bittorrent plugin. > >>> Maybe he even understands a Jabber client. > >>> > >>> The choice of tools is not limited by mental capacities yet. > >>> The question is how much are you intending to through encryption, > >>> thus privacy, out of the window. > >> > >> We're not. > > By which double negative I mean that we are *not* planning to throw > privacy out of the window.
As I said to Matt: This was a reading comprehension failure on my part. Sorry for implying you were privacy-opposed. I'll be more careful in the future.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
