Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> let's look the the cangen source if there's propper error handling... >> http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/socketcan/trunk/can-utils/cangen.c?revision=787&view=markup >> nope, there isn't >> >> There's the option "-i" to ignore ENOBUFS, which is....we don't want to >> do that.... >> > > I added a new "-p <timeout>" option to the cangen tool in the SocketCAN SVN. > > Thanks for the suggestion! > > Just fyi there's no significant difference in CPU usage or CAN bus load with
Hm, that does surprise me. At what bitrate are you testing? Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
