On 12.01.2011 15:39, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hi Yegor, > > On 01/12/2011 11:12 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >>>> Since slcan is supported by the mainline kernel, what about creating an >>>> extra project can-utils, introduce version number and start include it in >>>> various distributions? >>>> >>>> I've seen packages for Suse >>>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=i686-can-utils&project=home%3Aolh%3Across, >>>> but what about other distributions?
Btw. i've seen some debian package for the SocketCAN utils (on debian.org??) - but i don't know it's current state. >>> Good idea! Due to a lack of resources, the following items on the TODO >>> list did not really progress: >>> >>> - Unified and consolidated can-utils >> >> Do you mean the one from official socketcan repo and one from Pengutronix? > > Yes. For distributions we need a small set of cleaned up can-utils. > Unfortunately, there are some Yes, we should check, which of the tool are really relevant to 'common users'. >>> - Home page and Wiki >> >> Where should it reside? > > As long as we do not move away from BerliOS, the Wiki of > > http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ > > should be used. Yesterday I started to convert our can.txt to get > started. Oliver, did you already start a similar effort? What can.txt? The can.txt in socketcan/trunk/kernel/2.6/Documentation/networking/ has been already splitted up into small chunks by Daniele Venzano. Did you try 'svn up' ?? :-) Regards, Oliver _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
