Hi Marc, On 01/12/2011 05:25 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 01/12/2011 04:33 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>>>> Good idea! Due to a lack of resources, the following items on the TODO >>>>>> list did not really progress: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Unified and consolidated can-utils >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean the one from official socketcan repo and one from Pengutronix? >>>> >>>> Yes. For distributions we need a small set of cleaned up can-utils. >>>> Unfortunately, there are some >>> >>> Yes, we should check, which of the tool are really relevant to 'common >>> users'. > > I've just activated the git feature on berlios. It'l take up to 6 hours > for the scripts to create the initial directory.
Thanks. > The next step could be to import the svn history of the can-utils into > git. What are the preferred svn username to git author addresses? > > thuermann > wolf > hartkopp Do we need a preferred username? I know that finding a reasonable GIT author for SVN commits is difficult. If yes, the SVN commit user name would be fine. What is you proposal/idea for the new git tree. Do we want to convert everything? Well, a cleanup and restructuring could also be done later. My idea for consolidated can-utils and kernel drivers are: trunk/utils : Consolidated set of CAN utils for distros trunk/lib : libsocketcan for distros trunk/examples : Other useful CAN utils and examples (not for distros) trunk/scripts : socketcan-utils.spec, etc. trunk/kernel/... out off-tree drivers for Linux 2.4 and 2.6 Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
