> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:socketcan-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Van Dijck > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:22 AM > To: Yuriy Kiselev > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Socketcan-users] sja1000 BasicCAN mode > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:08:29PM +0400, Yuriy Kiselev wrote: > > Hello! > > Implementation of BasicCAN mode for SJA1000 is in attachment. > > Now SJA1000_PELICAN_MODE macros in sja1000.h is used for definition > PeliCAN > > or BasicCAN mode. It would be nice to create some menuconfig-wrapper, I > > think. > > I use this code for a few weeks and it looks stable. > I see no reason to use BasicCAN mode instead of PeliCAN mode. > Instead, I do see reasons to use PeliCAN mode: > > * no problems when 29bit frames appear on the bus > * rx queue of 64 byte. > > What is your motivation not to use PeliCAN mode? > > Kurt
Kurt is correct. For my understanding, the so-called basic CAN mode of the SJA1000 is a compatibility mode for the 82c200. It makes no sense to support it any more with SJA1000 devices. Heinz _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
