Wouldn't the solution be to update the FXTree so it can use OFX plugins? That opens a lot of doors.
-Paul On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau <luceri...@gmail.com>wrote: > > What does the FX Tree lack compared to AE / Nuke ? > > > It's not a good question to ask. It's like asking, what's the > difference between OneNote and EMACS. People use EMACS for a thousand > different reasons than taking notes, and so do people using AE or > Nuke. > > The low hanging fruits that are missing in the fxtree, for its main > intended purpose which it could hopes to fulfill are nodes for the > most common post processing for CG renderers, which includes 2D motion > blur and lens effects, and a quick text node. All of which is actually > in Composite, but we didn't have any the FX R&D at Avid (bafflingly, I > still don't know what the DS fx team worked on). Then again, someone > is always going to need some specific AE plug-in like "frischluft > lenscare" for AE, and dismiss the FxTree for that. >
