Unfortunately now Autodesk needs to have the same set of cahoonies, to make the 
app we all wish to use ;)
________________________________________
From: Luc-Eric Rousseau [luceri...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 August 2013 07:10 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: OT: Yost Group - related to the Naiad/SIGGRAPH discussion

On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Angus Davidson
<angus.david...@wits.ac.za> wrote:
>
> I always felt 3dsR4 was where it peaked . having to work with max 1 and 2 for 
> me wasn't a very pleasant experience. I was very grateful to move off off 
> that to a version of Softimage|DS
>
> I think the Autodesk management is underestimating how concerned their user 
> base has become.

Max 1 and 2 must have been a pretty tough time, given that it's a new
app that didn't work with any of the DOS plug-ins, and .. was written
for Windows NT, which nobody wanted to use or had the hardware for. (8
megs of RAM, are you crazy?)  This was a time when people were still a
couple years away from giving up hacking their config.sys and
autoexec.bat to tweak the 640k DOS memory. Of course XSI had it owns
OS choice issues and is still trailing the old SI|3D in animation
performance as well.  Still, being the vastly popular plug-in platform
that it is, Max is the app we all wish we could have made.
=
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" 
style="width:100%;"> 
<tr>
<td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" 
size="1" color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is 
intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original 
message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the 
permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to 
enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus 
advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the 
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which 
are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and 
outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in 
writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
</tr>
</table>


Reply via email to