here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10reItsMpXD309tOH7ZVF3trh6cHMmEtlNEdJWK7pnpM/edit?usp=sharing
2014-03-08 20:18 GMT+01:00 Eric Turman <i.anima...@gmail.com>: > So, who is going to create the google doc? > > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Mario Reitbauer <cont...@marioreitbauer.at > > wrote: > >> I signed the petition but still we (you) guys should maybe start thinking >> about stopping the daydreaming. >> AD made a decision and this decision is a final one. >> >> The only thing which could happen is: >> Okey guys we will continue to have Softimage in our product portfolio >> without developing for it. >> Is that what everyone wants ?? >> Staying with a software which isnt further developed ? In that case we >> can simply keep our old versions no problem. >> >> If you want anything else, you will not suceed anyways. It will end up >> working on a dead software, whatever we do. >> It is too late. Companies who are working with softimage will migrate to >> other software. Even if autodesk changes it's mind. >> So no more SI jobs will lead to the need to migrate to a new Software >> anyways. >> >> Just my 2 cent. >> And don't think I am not sad about what happend. >> >> >> 2014-03-08 19:30 GMT+01:00 Nick Martinelli <n...@nickmartinelli.net>: >> >> I apologize for labeling this as URGENT, I really feel that this >>> should be read by all regardless of side. >>> >>> >>> The outcry from the community is staggering both on here and the >>> petition (3520 in only a couple days!). I seriously doubt that AD's reps >>> were prepared for such a backlash. They are being bombarded with emails >>> right now, some full of warranted CG rage and others making valid points. >>> Due to this, it's very easy for them to get overlooked. I'm not defending >>> them, but I know that if I was in their shoes I wouldn't want to sift >>> through a bunch of emails putting me down. This isn't to say that those >>> thoughts aren't warranted, I know I'm fighting back some rage words as I'm >>> typing this. If we want answers, we unfortunately need to be diplomatic. >>> >>> This thread is intended to group all of our questions together in a >>> way that they can't go unnoticed. I have seen some fantastic inquiries >>> that haven't been addressed. So please word your questions concisely and >>> clearly here, also do your best to refrain from any insults or harsh >>> language. Lets organize everything in a polite and strategic way, if they >>> still go unanswered then they really aren't "listening". >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Nick Martinelli >>> (201) 424 - 6518 >>> www.nickMartinelli.net >>> n...@nickmartinelli.net >>> >> >> > > > -- > > > > > -=T=- >
