Leendert,
I don`t think people are conveniently overlooking the fact.
I wonder where Blender would be if it had the resources available
AD has to innovate, develop blablabla...
The more people support it in one or another way
the sooner it hopefully will reach the state
of being a true alternative to the AD route.
IMHO they already have come pretty far, don`t you think?
As mentioned before recent events force a lot of people to take
another look at what applications are out there - and where they stand
today.
People who looked at Blender, Modo or Houdini some time ago
and were not really comfortable with what they saw
seem to be pleasantly surprised to see how far those packages have come by
now.
And to take a closer look does not hurt for sure, right?
That does not take away the fact that AD does not provide a true alternative
which actually causes this mess people are facing now.
cheers, Klaus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leendert A. Hartog" <hirazib...@live.nl>
To: <softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Another alternative to Softimage
Problem with Blender IMHO still is, that everybody invariably mentions how
it's "making great strides"/"getting there",
conveniently overlooking the fact that this simply implies that it's not
there yet!
Greetz
Leendert
--
Leendert A. Hartog – Softimage hobbyist
AKA Hirazi Blue – Administrator @, NOT the owner of si-community.com
