" I think people just want the existing, production-proven ones they are used to,"
Well this goes also for Softimage for a lot of artist out there but doesn't meant a thing later when it was chopped down On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau <luceri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does anybody want a new compositor? I don't think they do. I think people > just want the existing, production-proven ones they are used to, cheaper. > What people have in their hands is pretty great already. > > btw autodesk doesn't own eddie/illusion/matador/ER, just the source code > of the fxtree, which doesn't really have any eddie in it and not that much > of the other ones. Personally I think all of this old source code base is > now worthless. > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Paul Griswold < > pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> wrote: >> >> Doesn't ADSK own Toxik, Composite, Smoke, Flame, FX Tree (Eddie, Media >> Illusion, Matador), as well as Elastic Reality (inside the FX Tree)? On >> top of that they have a fantastic vector paint program called Sketchbook >> Designer (not Sketchbook Pro, though that's pretty spiffy too). >> >> It seems like they already own enough technology to create the greatest >> compositor the world has ever seen. I wonder what the problem is? >> Leadership? Nah.... >> >> -PG >> >>
