Hi, i'm not into coding, but if it's something easy as replacing some lines i could try. I've using the Softimage 2014SP2 as my base, i have installed the 2015(soon i'll update that), for Mudbox i have the last 2014, and the last 2015 versions. I'm not planing to use Softimage 2015 until SP2 comes out, so i would love to send files from Mudbox 2015 to Softimage 2014, and viceversa. I know in practice it's impossible but in theory what you say could work. Hope you could remember what you need to do or test that again, it could help a lot of guys here. Thanks,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:21 PM, skuby <sku...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've manually fixed this in the past with version mis-matches. > "C:\Users\All Users\Autodesk\Synergy\". Somewhere in there you'll find > editable files that are in ascii. It might take a little trial and error, > but last I remember I figured the whole thing out and had it working in 10 > minutes. that got like a 2013/14 version of Soft sending/recieving to a > 2015 version mb/ -something like that, been a while and I dont' have any of > the apps handy on this machine to give perfect instructions. You will > probably have an easier time if you have an old MB 2014/2015 install which > you can refer to / copy/pasta bits from. -pretty confident you could get > this working somehow if you really wanted > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Tenshi S. <tenshu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think Mudbox will be better with a tool like "Zspheres", when they put >> a solution like that to create the base for models, i'll be more than >> happy; because Mudbox it's easy and most of the tools necessary are there. >> More brushes and presets are welcome, too. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> a 1:1 copy of some of the best ZBrush brushes (dam standard springs to >>> mind) >>> would have been nice, something ZBrush Dynamesh as a surprise extension, >>> too. >>> >>> How about some new presets, some vector tooltips/brush images, just a >>> little well deserved love. >>> >>> Mudbox is so nice in how easy it can be picked up and used (compared to >>> ZBrush´s GUI and methodology) >>> it´s sad that it´s been left out like that. >>> >>> Still, I took the treetrunk example, retopoed, subdivided it to some 50 >>> million polygons by mistake and Mudbox >>> kept itself responsive... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 01.05.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Tenshi S.: >>> >>> Your right. Few updates in 2016. Less than 4 features and a few bug >>> fixes. For a new version one will expect something more. At least 10 >>> features and 20 bug fixes. =/ >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Relax. I don´t want to miss the new Relax brush in Mudbox 2016. >>>> >>>> That´s the only green bracketed (highlight what´s new option = 1) I >>>> found sofar. >>>> >>>> I´m sure there´s more inovations but it´s in another package? >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 30.04.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Mirko Jankovic: >>>> >>>> well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made anything >>>> interesting in 2016 anyway.... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. <tenshu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it works >>>>> really good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too. Damn... how the heck >>>>> they remove this thing? It's really important feature, it saves a lot of >>>>> time. If they don't want to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try >>>>> to >>>>> put those lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's >>>>> coming?) version. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker <bauero...@gmx.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when being dealt >>>>>> an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled 2016 as part >>>>>> of >>>>>> a new suite package. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the past, I found it difficult to run differently labeled >>>>>> versions, e.g. Softimage 2012 >>>>>> with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to lmtools telling >>>>>> me there´s >>>>>> no license available, that could well be a setup error on my end or a >>>>>> misunderstanding >>>>>> of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of the problem, >>>>>> that Softimage2015 >>>>>> +Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a >>>>>> (suite)license, then it >>>>>> would be a good time to adress that, too? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> tim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back pedalled on >>>>>> some minor things like this before, so it might still happen, and it >>>>>> would >>>>>> be a welcome grace to a userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been >>>>>> slighted pretty hard. >>>>>> >>>>>> It certainly won't happen though if part of that user base takes >>>>>> the pessimist approach and claims it never worked, when it did, or >>>>>> because >>>>>> they don't need it assumes other don't either. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz <g...@janimation.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD should do it I >>>>>>> the SPs until the Soft support being promised until 2016" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us old softies a >>>>>>> favor and send the request the send up the ranks to send to apps back >>>>>>> in? >>>>>>> Did Maya and Max lose their send to soft connections too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we are in our right to ask for this small gesture from AD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing you can >>>>>>> promise, but give it a shot for those of us you used to your clients. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> g >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
