I'd have a couple of nasty ones too. Shall I just post them here?


Ok so I have very good reason to believe we will get an SP2 for Softimage and the Reinterpret location to new Geometry Node >will be fixed. "As mentioned, your issue has been reported to our engineering department.

Here is the logged issue with Development:

BSPR-18973 The 'reinterpret Location to new Geometry' ICE node does not work properly


No eta is determined for a fix date yet although I was told that they will look into integrating the fix on the next SP release."


SO... this will be the last fix we get in all likelihood.Time is running out. The reinterpret node was the only thing thats stopping me using 2015, so I'm delighted, but if there is anything >else you guys really want fixing in 2015 then lets assemble a list and post it to them. ( complete with examples etc). I'm in direct >communication with AD now so I can hopefully prompt them to give the list proper attention.
From: Matt MorrisSent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:08 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.comSubject: Re: Fuzz trouble

Its the compounds that allow hair pointclouds to deform along with animated geometry, and it does use the reinterpret node. Unfortunately >its something we used a lot!
If you try opening this model in 2014 it should be fine, open in 2015 and instant lock up:
https://app.box.com/s/vpctkz2k1xnxxhbc1dgglhr022gkc7sh
On 14 July 2015 at 09:17, <p...@bustykelp.com> wrote:
Do you know which ones? It may be that they are using the ‘reinterpret’ node too. It would be good to collate any >>other 2015 issues for a final fix push to AD. As to why some people on here are trying to influence me to not bother. It seems a very odd and defeatist thing to do >>and its not going to work.
Its the squeaky wheel that gets the oil.

From: Matt MorrisSent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:15 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Fuzz trouble

It also broke a few key compounds kristinka uses. I might be able to dig up an old scene if it will help. This stopped us moving to 2015 from >>2014sp2.
On 14 July 2015 at 00:55, Busty kelp <p...@bustykelp.com> wrote:
And AD asked me tonight for a sample scene to test.

Sent from my iPad

On 13 Jul 2015, at 21:38, Matt Lind <speye...@hotmail.com> wrote:

You overlook the fact you need to be on Softimage 2015 to get support. They're not going to touch 2013.


Matt





Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:07:36 +0100
From: <p...@bustykelp.com>
Subject: Re: Fuzz trouble
To: <softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>

Well so far its taken me around half an hour of my time.
In my book, a 1% chance is better than a 0% chance. I'm fully expecting them
to do nothing.
I have a face to face meeting with AD soon, not about this issue but in
which I will flag this again.
In the very least, I have a catalogued situation of me trying to get this fixed so I can work with the latest version and AD doing nothing about it.
I can refer to this in the future if necessary.

I don't use 2015 I use 2013, which is fine for me, so i have nothing to
lose. Thanks for your concern about my welfare though.






--www.matinai.com


--www.matinai.com



--
-------------------------------------------
Stefan Kubicek
-------------------------------------------
keyvis digital imagery
Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3
A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien
Phone: +43/699/12614231
www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at
-- This email and its attachments are --
--confidential and for the recipient only--

Reply via email to