Guys, did y´all read we didn´t get FBX 2015 on this SP? that sucks!! we are stuck with FBX 2014 exports.... At least that has shape-transfer for other apps; but FBX2015 on SP2 would´ve really nailed it. :(
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Stephan Haitz <sha...@3d-agenten.de> wrote: > What I would be interested in: Is there any difference regarding the > stability of SI2013 (SP1), SI2014 (SP2) or SI 2015 (SP2)? In general and in > special parts? > Any experience/opinion anyone? > > regards > > Stephan > > > Am 28.10.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Sven Constable: > >> Just check the online docs for new features: >> >> >> http://download.autodesk.com/global/docs/softimage2014/en_us/userguide/index.html >> >> >> http://docs.autodesk.com/SI/2015/ENU/#!/url=./files/new.htm >> >> >> Please find attached the lists of fixes from version 2014 to 2015 SP2. >> Quite a list since then :) >> >> Regards, >> >> Sven >> >> >> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: >> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Morten Bartholdy >> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 11:27 AM >> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> Subject: Softimage 2015 latest vs 2013 SP1? >> >> >> This came up the other day here - what exactly is the diifference between >> Softimage 2013 SP1 which we run here vs. the latest 2015 which I guess is >> SP2? >> >> >> >From my understanding there are no actual new features, but an >> assortment of improvements in ICE, the viewport and some Alembic exchange >> stuff. I would sort of love to be proven wrong though. >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Morten >> >> >> >> > -- Portfolio 2013 <http://be.net/3dcinetv> Cinema & TV production Video Reel <https://vimeo.com/3dcinetv/reel2012>
