Hi Yiu, Thank you for your reply. In broadband internet services, the typical scenario is using plain IP-in-IP, and allowing overlapping private IPv4 addresses. Perhaps we need to support this typical scenario in the new version.
B. R. Tina http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee, Yiu" <[email protected]> To: "Tina TSOU" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? Hi Tina, Question for you. When you said to identify the user, did you mean to identify the user by IPv4 address or some other means like the GRE id? The basic DS-lite always assumes no duplicate IPv4 addresses managed by one B4. Can you elaborate the question? Thanks, Yiu On 5/6/10 3:49 AM, "Tina TSOU" <[email protected]> wrote: > Support with comments. > > There is only on tunnel between B4 and AFTR in GI-DS-lite. In the cases, > which there are duplicated addresses for UEs, it needs to identify different > user. For plain IP-in-IP tunnel, there is no mean to identify user. Perhaps > it could be solved in the next version of GI-DS-lite draft. > > > B. R. > Tina > http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > > I'm in favor of adopting it as WG item. It's a nice piece of work and fits > very well to the deployment scenarios of mobile operators. > > Kind regards > Olaf > >> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Alain Durand >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? >> >> Dear WG, >> >> At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest >> in GI DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should >> take on its standardization. There was similar interest shown >> during the last IETF meeting and an informal show of hands >> demonstrated large support to take GI DS-lite as a working group item. >> This of course need to be confirmed on the list, and unless >> we hear otherwise, we, Softwires chairs, will work with our >> ADs to add GI-DS-lite on our charter. >> >> - Alain, softwires co-chair. >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
