Hi Ahmad,
----- Original Message ---- > From: Ahmad Muhanna <[email protected]> > To: Alain Durand <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 9:49:07 AM > Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > Hi Alain, Sorry that I was not at the last IETF meeting nor the > IETF-3GPP meeting and I am some what ignorant of the amount of support this > draft received and the arguments that have been used in these meetings . > However, declaring the adoption of this draft as a WG document in 5 days > without > specifying a deadline seems to me a little fast! On the other hand, > After reading this draft a couple of times. I failed to understand the value > of > this solution to MIP6 and PMIP6 as they quite clearly referenced in the > draft. >In other words, since mobility architecture seems to be a major > beneficiary target for this solution, it is quite important for us to > understand > what this draft offers and how it fits or overlay this architecture? DS-Lite for mobility has been discussed in our draft: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-softwire-dslitemobility-01.txt this draft needs to be updated but we were lazy to do so :-). GI DS-Lite assumes an unmodified core so it works well with GTP like mobility protocols. There are other things but I don't know if it is worth discussing them. Regards, --b _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
