On 1/21/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the bottom of this email is a quick and dirty servlet i just tried to prove to myself that posting with params in the URL and the body worked fine ...
I tried that by simply posting to the Solr standard request handler (it echoes params in the example config), and yes, it worked fine. The problem is if the body should be the stream, and the content-type is wrong (and we currently send it wrong with curl).
The nut shell being: i'm totally on board with Ryan's simple URL scheme, having a single RequestParser/SolrRequestBuilder, going with an entirely "inspection" based approach for deciding where the streams come from, and leaving all mention of parsers or "stream.type" out of the URL. (because i have a good idea of how to support it in a backwards campatible way *later*)
Ahhhh. -Yonik
