[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485065
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-199:
---------------------------------------
While I was the one who started that n-gram approach, and while I'm saving code
and config changes from that work "just in case", I'm not sure why we'd add it
to Solr at this point, if nothing is going to use it. I'd say keep the patch
here, so one can easily put that back into Solr when a need arises, but don't
commit it unless there is some immediate need. Do you have something that
needs the n-gram stuff in Solr?
> N-gram
> ------
>
> Key: SOLR-199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Adam Hiatt
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: SOLR-81-ngram.patch
>
>
> This tracks the creation of a patch that adds the n-gram/edge n-gram
> tokenizing functionality that was initially part of SOLR-81 (spell checking).
> This was taken out b/c the lucene SpellChecker class removed this dependency.
> None-the-less, I think this is useful functionality and the addition is
> trivial. How does everyone feel about such an addition?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
