I do sympathize; it does seem wrong, but it's the norm in Java because Sun screwed up Jdk14 logging. It's not a reflection of the design decisions of Solr (i.e. your judgement) so please don't feel too bad accepting SLF4J.
~ David Erik Hatcher wrote: > > My main point is philosophical - adding another dependency just for > logging seems so wrong. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-tp13747253p16962888.html Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
