I agree, slf4j is a better solution; I was just trying to mitigate the functional need (hooking log4j) & the strong (op)positions against changing the logging API, thus the mildly disgusting solr-549 strawman. :-)
David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote: > > Whenever I see a project with some home-grown LogManager that provides > loggers, I am always mildly disgusted no matter how simple it is (no > disrespect to you, that is my opinion). I believe use of SLF4J will meet > common goals. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-tp13747253p16967768.html Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
