Does every thread really need to notify the update handler of the commit
interval/threshold being reached, or really just the first thread that
notices should send the signal, or better yet a background commit watching
thread so that no "foreground" thread has to pay attention at all.  That is
assuming they wouldn't need to block like they are now for a reason I'm
likely unaware of...

--j
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/DirectUpdateHandler2-threads-pile-up-behind-scheduleCommitWithin-tp23431691p23431745.html
Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to