Chris Hostetter wrote:
Perhaps instead of making API additions/generalizations to XMLWriter, we should approach the problem differnelty and think about what a good reusable general pupose XML generation toolkit that could be used by custom response writers should look like, and then implement that -- refactoring the existing XMLWriter class to use/extend this new class where possible?
I agree completely. Looking at solr/lucene from an XML/XSLT/X... background my first impression is that the XML/XSLT features are just what is absolutely necessary to get it running. As we are going to use solr in an XML based environment, we'll be happy to exchange ideas about "full" (or at least "more" xml support.
-- Age Jan Kuperus FB ICT / Wageningen UR Library
