[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789879#action_12789879
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1298:
---------------------------------------
bq. we should also let search components add extra fields to the document.
I think we could handle this via the ResponseBuilder by storing an <id, <name,
value>> pairing in a map that the ResponseWriter could then consult when it
needs it as it's streaming out the results. Tricky part is what to do when
there are no ids, I suppose.
> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as
> fields to a document.
> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the
> document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.