[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789889#action_12789889
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1298:
----------------------------------
{quote}
I certainly can. I hadn't thought about having a function as an fl parameter
value, but that makes alot of sense and I can support that through my work as
well. I'll work on extracting the code today and will get a patch here ASAP.
{quote}
As far as I recall the fact the functions are specified in the fl parameter
should still work with the FieldValueSource as it is at the moment. The
registry enables you to register any value for any string key, in this case the
string key is the function.
> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as
> fields to a document.
> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the
> document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
