[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843373#action_12843373
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
--------------------------------

bq. Okay, I sat down and thought about what we should do before really reading 
through your suggestion - and I came up with practically the exact same thing - 
so I think this is what we should attempt.

I know i brought it up here in the issue comments, but I think we should 
probably track this type of change in a separate issue as an "Improvement"

for the scope of this issue, let's start by getting a simpler patch commited 
that at least restores the behavior from 1.4 -- w/solr.xml you always get 
"missing core name" on config error, w/o solr.xml you get good error messages 
even if solrconfig.xml can't be parsed.  It won't help new users in who start 
with the current example from the trunk (since it has a solr.xml) but it will 
get things back to where they were for existing users who try upgrading.

As i recall one of the patches already posted does this just fine (i just can't 
remember which one) so that part should be fairly straight forward.

> error reporting is rendering "404 missing core name in path" for all type of 
> errors
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Marcin
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1743.patch, SOLR-1743.patch, SOLR-1743.patch, 
> SOLR-1743.patch, SOLR-1743.patch
>
>
> despite the error in schema syntax or any other type of error you will always 
> get:
> "404 missing core name in path" communicate.
> cheers,
> /Marcin

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to