I tend to agree w/ Hoss here. I don't think we have to be the same version numbers and I don't think we absolutely have to do lockstep releases.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : In the interest of moving forward, perhaps we should just focus on the > : immediate next major release - 3.1. What happens after can wait. We > : never planned for absolutely all the "what if's" in Solr before the > : merge - I'm not sure why we would need to now. > > I suppose, but if we call the next solr release "Solr 3.1" it will set a > precedent that will likely be impossible to maintain in a sane manner. > > > -Hoss >
