On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On version numbering... my inclination would be to let Solr and Lucene > use their own version numbers (don't sync them up). I know it'd > simplify our lives to have the same version across the board, but > these numbers are really for our users, telling them when big changes > were made, back compat broken, etc. I think that trumps dev > convenience.
Be sure to consider the deprecations removal, its not possible for Solr to move to Lucene's trunk without this. Here are two examples of necessary deprecation removals in the branch so that Solr can use Lucene's trunk: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1820 http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/f07da8e4d69f5bfe/removal_of_deprecated_htmlstrip_tokenizer_factories It seems to be the consensus that people want a major version change number when this is done. So this is an example where the version numbers of Solr really do relate to Lucene, if we want them to share the same trunk. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
