Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the difference?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot to > attach earlier. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466 > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. > > > > Please... > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no > > discussion > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a > custom > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a > copy > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately. > > > > > > Jamie > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have > > > been > > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required > > to > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in > > > this > > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached > to > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that appropriate > > or > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support? > > > > > > > > -Jamie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Bill Bell > > billnb...@gmail.com > > cell 720-256-8076 > > > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
