The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a facet.method=dv and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior. While I think it's strange that facet.method=dv does not exist and fc defaults to dv I think if we wanted to change that it should be done in another ticket.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the > difference? > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot > to > > attach earlier. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466 > > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the > facet > > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. > > > > > > Please... > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and > inline > > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no > > > discussion > > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a > > custom > > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a > > copy > > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately. > > > > > > > > Jamie > > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may > have > > > > been > > > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in > the > > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be > required > > > to > > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does > in > > > > this > > > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached > > to > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that > appropriate > > > or > > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support? > > > > > > > > > > -Jamie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Bill Bell > > > billnb...@gmail.com > > > cell 720-256-8076 > > > > > > > > > -- > Bill Bell > billnb...@gmail.com > cell 720-256-8076 >
