I am not saying that fq parameter does not work with dismax. I am saying that the way this query is written it wont work because the dismax query handler would parse "type:idea" to a value "type idea" (without the colon) which changes the query. This would be a problem whether you use it in the main query or filter query.
This standard search handler wont parse it this way and hence you would get different results depending on the handler used. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Preetam Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have used fq the way it is with dismax and it works fine. > fq is standard parameter and not specific to dismax. > So type:idea should work correctly. > > - > Preetam > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, chris sleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > btw, this *seems* to only work for me with standard search handler. > > dismax > > and fq: dont' seem to get along nicely... > > > > Wouldnt the dismax parser consider the filter query parameter as "type > > idea" > > and not value "idea" for solr field - "type"? > > I guess thats the reason this query doesnt work with dismax, the way it > > works with the standard search handler. You can add a "debugQuery=true" > > parameter to check the actual parsed query. > > > > -Chris > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Norberto Meijome < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:43 +0530 > > > > "Preetam Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> When I say filter, I meant q=fish&fq=type:idea > > > > > > > > btw, this *seems* to only work for me with standard search handler. > > > dismax and fq: dont' seem to get along nicely... but maybe, it is just > > late > > > and i'm not testing it properly.. > > > > > > It should work the same... the only thing dismax does differently now > > > is change the type of the base query to "dismax". > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Bill Cosby - "Advertising is the most fun you can have with your clothes > > on." > > > -- Regards, Chris
