I don't have any production logs.... and this all sounds to complicated. So, I'll just trow the system together in a way it makes the most sense for now.. collect some logs and then do some testing further down the road. For now just get the sucker up and running.
Thanks all On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure if I understand your question > > *"How do I test this?"* > You have to run test (benchmark test) of transactions (queries) which are > most representative of your system (requirement). > > You can use a performance testing tool like JMeter (along with PerfMon > configured for utilisation metrics) > > > > Deepak > "Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan" > +91 73500 12833 > deic...@gmail.com > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool > > "Plant a Tree, Go Green" > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:57 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So Im thinking following scenarios : > > Single instance with drives in raid 0, raid 10 and raid 5. > > > > And then having 3 Vms and 4 Solr instances each with its own HD. > > > > How do I test this? > > > > > > Greetz > > > > On Mar 12, 2018 1:16 PM, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > OK, so we're gone nowhere, since I've already lost lots of time... A > > few > > > days more or less won't make a difference.... I'd be willing to > > benchmark > > > if some tells me how to. > > > > > > > > > Greetz > > > > > > On Mar 12, 2018 7:17 AM, "Deepak Goel" <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Now you are mixing your original question about performance with > > >> reliability > > >> > > >> On 12 Mar 2018 02:29, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be > fault > > >> > tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in RAID 0? Plus to his > > comes > > >> > the storage capacity, I need the capacity of those 4 drives... the > > more > > >> I > > >> > read.. the more questions.... > > >> > > > >> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:43 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Thnx for the pointers. > > >> > > > > >> > > I haven't given much thought to Solr, asides shemal.xml and > > >> > solrconfig.xml > > >> > > and I'm just diving into a bit more deeper stuff! > > >> > > > > >> > > Greetz > > >> > > > > >> > > RRK > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> To rephrase your Question > > >> > >> > > >> > >> "Does Solr do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?" > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there > > >> supporting > > >> > the > > >> > >> claim? > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Hi, > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > I have some questions regarding performance. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Lets says I have a dual CPU with a total of 8 cores and 24 GB > RAM > > >> for > > >> > my > > >> > >> > Solr and some other stuff. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Would it be more beneficial to only run 1 instance of Solr with > > the > > >> > >> > collection stored on 4 HD's in RAID 0?? Or.... Have several > > Virtual > > >> > >> > Machines each running of its own HD, ie: Have 4 VM's running > > Solr? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Any Thoughts? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Thank you! > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > RRK > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
