Deepak "Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan" +91 73500 12833 deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool "Plant a Tree, Go Green" On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:32 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 3/16/2018 4:24 PM, Deepak Goel wrote: > > It is taking less than 100ms to create a HttpSolrClient Object > > "Less than 100ms" is vague. Let's say by that you mean it takes at > least 50 milliseconds. This is a lot slower than I expected it to be, > but if you've measured it, I'll accept that. > > The results were a bit volatile from test to test. It used to take sometimes 75ms and sometimes around 95ms. So I have stated the upper-bound on the results (100ms) (Sorry for being rude) However you don't need to accept my results. May I suggest you to measure it yourself (or anyone else can also do it) > If every single thread you're running has to spend 50 milliseconds or > more creating a client before it can actually send a request, then the > application is going to be spending a lot of time NOT sending requests, > but creating and destroying clients. (You didn't indicate how long the > close() takes) > I did implement your solution (On windows it does not make a difference, on Linux it does by at-least a margin of twice) > > Your numbers indicated a response time of 1426 milliseconds for Solr. > If this is an average or a median, then that is not a fast query. These > numbers make me question the entire benchmark setup. Do you have any specific questions about the benchmark setup? > Based on the code > provided, I don't see how the numbers can be that bad, even if we assume > that up to 100 milliseconds is spent creating every client. > > I have stated the numbers which I found during my test. The best way to verify them is for someone else to run the same test. Otherwise I don't see how we can verify the results > Because the ES numbers are so much worse than the Solr numbers, I'm > betting that creating an ES client is even less efficient than creating > a Solr client. If that's the case, I do not know why ... maybe that > client runs through more startup checks than a Solr client does. > Creation time for the client shouldn't matter, since it should only be > done once for every benchmark run, and the time spent creating the > client shouldn't be counted in the benchmark numbers. > > I can check up & optimise the ES code. However it will take me a couple of weeks on that > Thanks, > Shawn > >
